What Impact Did the Mitford Family and Bright Young Things Have on Evelyn Waugh's Legacy?

A Look Back at WWD’s Coverage of the Mitford Family and Bright Young Things

The history of the Mitford family and the Bright Young Things is a fascinating tableau of British aristocracy, intellectualism, and social commentary. The Women’s Wear Daily (WWD) has chronicled these two interconnected worlds over the years, providing insights into the lives of notable figures such as Nancy, Jessica, and Deborah Mitford, as well as their contemporaries. This article revisits the key moments of WWD’s coverage, showcasing the evolution of these influential personalities and the societal changes they witnessed. From Nancy Mitford's literary endeavors to the controversial views of Diana Mosley, the Mitford sisters and their circle of Bright Young Things have left an indelible mark on culture and literature.

The Early Years: Nancy Mitford and Her Literary Pursuits

In 1965, WWD’s Paris bureau correspondent, Thelma Sweetinburgh, had the privilege of visiting Nancy Mitford shortly after the release of her novel, “Don’t Tell Alfred.” During this visit, Nancy shared her insights on writing, her lifestyle, and her aversion to contemporary pop culture. “There is more work in my books than appears,” she told Sweetinburgh, emphasizing her dedication to the craft of writing. Despite her success, Nancy remained blissfully unaware of the Beatles and the burgeoning nightclub culture of the 1960s.

Her candid remarks about dinner parties, where “you get stuck with neighbors who aren’t particularly exciting,” painted a picture of an intellectual who preferred the company of her own thoughts, often working diligently in bed on her manuscripts. This personal glimpse into Mitford’s life speaks volumes about the complexities of her character—a mix of wit, introspection, and a refreshingly unpretentious approach to fame.

Jessica Mitford: A Radical Perspective on Society

Jessica Mitford, known for her fierce advocacy and social activism, provided a stark contrast to her sister Nancy. In 1973, WWD featured Jessica discussing her book, “Kind and Usual Punishment: The Prison Business,” which scrutinized the U.S. prison system. Her radical views on crime and punishment sparked conversations that remain relevant today. When asked about her ideas for handling lawbreakers, Jessica suggested that “many of them could be handled by a good talking to from their friends and neighbors.”

Her perspective challenged the very foundations of the American justice system, attributing the roots of crime to societal failures. Jessica’s arguments, which included the notion that capitalism breeds crime, echoed the sentiments of many social reformers. “The qualities of aggressiveness and competition which are fostered by capitalism put some people in prison and others in the White House,” she argued, drawing a compelling parallel between societal structure and individual behavior.

The Rise of Hatty Waugh: A Legacy Under Scrutiny

In 1978, WWD profiled Hatty Waugh, the daughter of novelist and social satirist Evelyn Waugh. Hatty’s literary journey was colored by the weight of her father’s legacy, and she faced criticism from the literary establishment. During her interview with WWD, she recounted her experiences with the press and how her debut novel, “Mirror, Mirror,” was panned by critics who dismissed her as merely “cashing in on Daddy’s name.”

This reflection on the challenges that come with familial expectations adds another layer to the Mitford narrative, illustrating how the influences of lineage can shape an artist's career. Hatty’s determination to carve her own path, despite the weight of her father’s reputation, is a testament to the complex dynamics of literary heritage.

Diana Mosley: Controversy and Charisma

In 1985, WWD turned its attention to Diana Mosley, another Mitford sister, whose life was fraught with controversy due to her association with the Nazi regime. Mosley’s book, “Loved Ones,” offered a glimpse into her social circle, which included notable figures such as Evelyn Waugh and her husband, Sir Oswald Mosley. During her interview, Diana addressed the media’s fascination with her family. “The press decides on certain families and writers about them without much reason, really,” she noted, highlighting the fickle nature of public interest.

Her reflections on the duality of fame—where the media both elevates and critiques—resonated with the experiences of many public figures. “What Shakespeare said is so true, really: The appetite grows with what it feeds on,” she remarked, encapsulating the complex relationship between celebrity and public perception.

Filming and Nostalgia: The Legacy of Evelyn Waugh

In the late 1980s, WWD reported on the film adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s comic novel “Scoop.” The film was based on Waugh’s experiences as a war correspondent and aimed to capture the essence of the era. Film star Nicola Pagett emphasized the obsession with nostalgia in British culture, stating, “We’re hooked on nostalgia in this country — we’re addicted to it.”

This sentiment reflects a broader societal yearning for the glamour and charm of a bygone era—a theme that continues to resonate in contemporary media. The allure of Waugh’s work and the Bright Young Things era serves as a reminder of the enduring power of storytelling to shape cultural identity and collective memory.

Stephen Fry and the Modern Interpretation of Bright Young Things

Fast forward to 2004, and WWD featured a conversation with Stephen Fry about his screen adaptation of Waugh’s “Vile Bodies,” known for its portrayal of the Bright Young Things. Fry’s reflections on the modern interpretation of this vibrant social scene were thought-provoking. He lamented the commercialization of contemporary social gatherings, stating, “You can’t ever be a Bright Young Thing.”

His insights highlighted the shift in social dynamics, emphasizing that today’s parties are often driven by corporate sponsorship rather than genuine camaraderie. Fry urged a return to authenticity in social interactions, advocating for a zest for life and a love of language that transcends commercialism. “If you find yourself following, just go ‘Baaa,’” he quipped, urging a rejection of societal pressures to conform.

The Duchess of Devonshire: Reflections on the Past

In 2010, WWD’s London bureau chief Samantha Conti interviewed Deborah Cavendish, the Dowager Duchess of Devonshire and the youngest of the Mitford sisters. During their conversation at the Chatsworth estate, Deborah reminisced about the grand parties she organized and attended during her youth. Her candid recollections offered a unique perspective on the social landscape of the time, particularly the impact of the Kennedy family’s visit to London.

Deborah’s anecdote about dancing with Jack Kennedy and her mother’s keen instinct about people illuminated the connections between personal experiences and historical events. “I wouldn’t be surprised if that boy doesn’t become president of the United States,” her mother had predicted, showcasing the foresight that often comes with familiarity and intuition.

The Enduring Influence of the Mitford Family and Bright Young Things

The Mitford sisters and the Bright Young Things crowd represent a unique intersection of literature, social commentary, and cultural history. Their stories, as chronicled by WWD, showcase the complexities of identity, fame, and societal expectations. From Nancy’s literary prowess to Jessica’s radical ideas, each member of the Mitford family contributed to a broader dialogue about the nature of society and the human experience.

As we reflect on the legacy of these remarkable individuals, it becomes clear that their influence continues to resonate in contemporary culture. Their lives were marked by vibrant personalities, intellectual debates, and an unwavering quest for authenticity in a rapidly changing world.

FAQs

Who were the Mitford sisters?

The Mitford sisters were six aristocratic siblings in Britain who gained fame for their distinct personalities and contributions to literature and politics. The most notable among them include Nancy, Jessica, and Deborah, who each had a significant impact on societal discussions in their respective eras.

What was the Bright Young Things movement?

The Bright Young Things were a group of young, socialites in 1920s and 1930s Britain known for their extravagant parties, fashion, and hedonistic lifestyle. They were often seen as the embodiment of youthful exuberance and rebellion against traditional norms.

How did the Mitford sisters influence literature and society?

The Mitford sisters wrote extensively on various subjects, from novels to social critiques, and their works often reflected their unique perspectives on class, politics, and gender. Their lives and writings sparked discussions around social issues and contributed to the cultural landscape of their time.

The Mitford family and the Bright Young Things crowd have woven a rich tapestry of narratives that continue to captivate audiences. Their stories serve as a reminder of the intricate connections between personal experiences and societal changes. What part of the Mitford family’s legacy do you find most intriguing? #MitfordLegacy #BrightYoungThings #CulturalHistory