What Led to the Investigation of Kick Over a Streamer's Death?

This article discusses the investigation by French prosecutors into the Australian video platform Kick following the tragic death of content creator Raphaël Graven, also known as Jean Pormanove, during a livestream. Authorities are examining whether Kick knowingly broadcast content that compromised personal integrity and if they adhered to the EU’s Digital Services Act.

Last updated: 18 August 2023 (BST)

Key Takeaways

• French prosecutors have opened an investigation into Kick after the death of content creator Raphaël Graven.
• Graven was known for livestreams featuring extreme challenges and humiliation.
• The investigation will assess if Kick violated the EU’s Digital Services Act.
• France's government plans to sue Kick for negligence in handling dangerous content.
• Graven's death raised concerns about the safety of livestreaming platforms.

Background on the Incident

On 18 August 2023, Raphaël Graven was found dead at a residence near Nice, France. The 46-year-old content creator gained notoriety for his daring livestreams, which often included self-imposed challenges involving violence and humiliation. Reports indicate that he experienced episodes of violence and sleep deprivation, culminating in his death during a live broadcast.

The Role of Kick

Kick, an Australian platform, has faced intense scrutiny following Graven’s passing. French authorities are investigating whether the platform "knowingly" allowed the broadcast of content that could be deemed harmful or dangerous. According to the Paris prosecutor, the investigation will delve into the nature of the content streamed by Graven and the extent to which Kick was aware of the risks involved.

Legal Obligations Under the EU’s Digital Services Act

The Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes certain responsibilities on digital platforms, including the obligation to remove illegal content and to notify authorities when users' safety is at risk. The Paris prosecutor's office is exploring whether Kick complied with these regulations in light of the dangerous content associated with Graven's streams.

Government Response

In a parallel development, Clara Chappaz, France's minister for digital affairs, announced that the government would sue Kick for negligence. Chappaz highlighted the platform's failure to effectively manage and block dangerous content, calling Graven's death an "absolute horror." This legal action underscores the growing concern over the responsibility of content platforms in ensuring user safety.

Public Reaction and Industry Implications

The incident has sparked widespread debate about the ethics of content creation and the responsibilities of livestreaming platforms. Graven's death highlights the potential dangers of extreme content and raises questions about the mental and physical toll on content creators who partake in such challenges. As the investigation unfolds, it may lead to a reassessment of how platforms moderate content and respond to user safety concerns.

Potential Outcomes of the Investigation

As the investigation progresses, several outcomes are possible. If prosecutors find that Kick failed to adhere to the DSA, the platform could face legal repercussions, including fines or stricter regulations. Additionally, if the investigation concludes that Kick knowingly allowed harmful content, it may set a precedent for accountability in the digital content industry.

What Happens Next?

With the investigation still ongoing, Kick's future in the European market hangs in the balance. The platform has stated that it is "urgently reviewing" the circumstances surrounding Graven's death. Industry observers will be monitoring the situation closely, as the outcomes could influence regulatory changes and shape the future of content moderation practices across livestreaming platforms.

Conclusion

The tragic death of Raphaël Graven serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers associated with extreme content creation on livestreaming platforms like Kick. As the investigation unfolds, it is essential for both platforms and content creators to prioritise user safety and adhere to established regulations. The implications of this case could resonate throughout the industry, prompting a reevaluation of practices and policies aimed at protecting content creators and their audiences.

FAQs

What triggered the investigation into Kick?

The investigation was initiated following the death of content creator Raphaël Graven during a livestream, raising concerns about the nature of the content broadcasted on the platform.

What is the Digital Services Act?

The Digital Services Act is a European Union regulation that sets out responsibilities for online platforms to ensure user safety and to remove illegal content promptly.

What actions has the French government taken against Kick?

The French government plans to sue Kick for negligence, accusing the platform of failing to block dangerous content that could jeopardise user safety.

How did Raphaël Graven die?

Raphaël Graven was found dead at home, reportedly after experiencing violence and sleep deprivation during his livestreams, which culminated in his passing during a live broadcast.

What can other content creators learn from this incident?

This incident highlights the importance of considering the risks associated with extreme content creation and the need for platforms to enforce stricter safety measures.