Did Trump Really Want Sadiq Khan at the State Banquet?

The ongoing feud between US President Donald Trump and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has intensified following Trump's comments about Khan's absence from a state banquet at Windsor Castle. Trump claimed he did not want Khan there, labelling him "among the worst mayors in the world" and criticising his handling of crime in London. In contrast, Khan's team defended the mayor, asserting that London remains a global success despite Trump's divisive rhetoric.

Last updated: 29 September 2023 (BST)

Key Takeaways

• Trump described Khan as "among the worst mayors in the world".
• Sir Sadiq Khan did not seek an invitation to the state banquet.
• The feud dates back to 2015 and has included personal attacks from both sides.
• Protests marked Trump's recent visit to the UK, highlighting public sentiment.
• Khan's spokesperson emphasised London's status as a global success story.

Background of the Feud

The friction between Donald Trump and Sadiq Khan began in 2015 when Khan, then the newly elected mayor, condemned Trump's comments regarding banning Muslims from entering the US. This public disagreement set the stage for a series of exchanges that have only escalated over the years. In 2016, Trump challenged Khan to an IQ test, an assertion that Khan dismissed.

As tensions rose, Trump continued to scrutinise Khan's performance, particularly in relation to crime rates in London, which became a focal point of his criticism. In 2017, after the London Bridge terror attack, Trump attacked Khan's response, which he claimed was inadequate.

Trump's Recent Comments

During a flight back to the US on Air Force One, Trump reiterated his negative views on Khan, stating, "I think he's done a terrible job. Crime in London is through the roof." The President expressed that he preferred Khan not to attend the state banquet, saying, "I asked that he not be there. He wanted to be there, as I understand, I didn't want him."

This sentiment echoes Trump's 2019 comment where he referred to Khan as "a stone-cold loser," indicating a long-standing animosity between the two leaders. Trump's characterisation of Khan's tenure as a "disaster" reflects his broader concerns about crime and immigration policies in London.

Khan's Response

In response to Trump's comments, a source close to Khan rejected the characterisation of his tenure as mayor. The spokesperson stated, "Trump's politics is one of fear and division," and highlighted London's achievements, saying, "London is a global success story - it's open, dynamic, and safer than major US cities." This assertion points to a contrasting narrative that emphasises London's strengths in attracting international residents.

Protests and Public Sentiment

Trump's state visit to the UK has consistently been accompanied by protests, reflecting a significant portion of the British public's discontent with his policies. During this latest visit, thousands gathered in Parliament Square, with some expressing their views through demonstrations and visual displays, including the infamous "Trump baby" blimp, which has become a symbol of opposition to the US president.

Additionally, four men were arrested after images of Trump alongside convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle. These protests serve as a reminder of the divided opinions surrounding Trump's leadership and his relationship with UK politics.

The Impact on UK-US Relations

Despite the ongoing feud and public protests, Trump's visits have been officially portrayed as a demonstration of the "warm relations" between the UK and the US. The second state visit, unprecedented for a non-royal figure, was marked by ceremonial events that aimed to reinforce the strong ties between the two nations.

However, the undercurrent of dissent and the public's disapproval of Trump's views complicate this narrative. The contrasting opinions of leaders like Khan and Trump highlight the complexities of international relations, especially when personal animosities become public spectacles.

What Happens Next?

The future of the Trump-Khan feud remains uncertain. With both figures holding firm to their respective positions, it is likely that their disputes will continue to make headlines. The political landscape in both the US and the UK is subject to change, and developments in their relationship could impact broader diplomatic ties.

As both leaders continue to navigate their roles, the public sentiment surrounding their discourse will likely play a significant role in shaping ongoing interactions. It remains to be seen how their feud will evolve and influence both domestic and international politics moving forward.

FAQs

Why does Trump criticise Sadiq Khan?

Trump criticises Sadiq Khan primarily over crime rates in London and Khan's handling of immigration policies. This animosity has developed over several years, beginning with Khan's opposition to Trump's controversial remarks on Muslims.

Did Sadiq Khan expect an invitation to the state banquet?

No, Sir Sadiq Khan did not seek or expect an invitation to the state banquet hosted by the King at Windsor Castle, according to sources close to the mayor.

What impact do protests have on Trump's visits to the UK?

Protests during Trump's visits underscore public dissent towards his policies and rhetoric, often overshadowing the ceremonial aspects of the visit and reflecting the divided opinions within the UK.

How has the relationship between Trump and Khan evolved?

The relationship has evolved into a public feud characterised by personal attacks and criticisms, with both figures publicly expressing their disdain for one another over various political issues.

What are the main criticisms of Sadiq Khan's tenure as mayor?

Main criticisms from Trump focus on rising crime rates in London and Khan's approach to immigration policies. However, Khan's supporters argue that London remains a safe and successful global city.