Did a Duo Conspire for a Controversial Finish?

In a significant ruling from the British Horseracing Authority (BHA), former jockey Dylan Kitts has been found guilty of conspiring with trainer John Higgins to manipulate the outcome of a race. Kitts admitted to intentionally preventing his mount, Hillsin, from achieving its best possible position during a handicap hurdle at Worcester in July 2023, raising serious concerns about integrity in British racing.

Last updated: 01 November 2023 (BST)

Key Takeaways

• Dylan Kitts admitted to corrupt practices during a 2023 race.
• John Higgins allegedly threatened Kitts to manipulate the horse's performance.
• The BHA concluded Kitts had opportunities to refuse compliance.
• Trainer Chris Honour was cleared of complicity but misled stewards.
• A sanctions hearing is scheduled for November 2023.

Background of the Case

The case against Dylan Kitts and John Higgins emerged from an investigation into the performance of Hillsin during a race at Worcester on 5 July 2023. Kitts, 24, confessed at a disciplinary hearing that he had deliberately held back his horse to avoid a better finish. He claimed this was due to threats made by Higgins, who is notably the father-in-law of Premier League footballer Ashley Barnes.

However, the independent disciplinary panel concluded that Kitts was not under threat and had several opportunities to refuse Higgins's instructions. This finding underscores a critical aspect of the BHA's commitment to maintaining integrity within the sport.

The Role of John Higgins

John Higgins's involvement in this case raises significant questions, particularly given his relationship with prominent figures in sports. As an associate of Hillsin's owner, Alan Clegg, Higgins's actions have cast a shadow over the fairness of horse racing in the UK. Despite the serious allegations, Higgins has not faced any charges from the BHA, which has drawn criticism from various stakeholders within the racing community.

Trainer Chris Honour’s Involvement

Chris Honour, the trainer of Hillsin, was also scrutinised during the investigation. While he was charged, the BHA ultimately cleared him of any involvement in the conspiracy. However, the panel found that Honour had misled the stewards during a post-race inquiry, showcasing a breach of trust that further complicates the case's implications for racing integrity.

The Impact on British Racing

The BHA's statement following the hearing highlighted the vital importance of maintaining confidence in British racing. They noted that incidents like these are detrimental to the sport and undermine the dedication of countless individuals who strive for fair competition. The ruling serves as a reminder of the BHA's commitment to rooting out corruption and ensuring that the integrity of horse racing is upheld.

Next Steps and Sanctions

A sanctions hearing is anticipated to take place in early to mid-November 2023. This will determine the penalties for Kitts and any further actions against Higgins. The timing of this hearing is critical, as it will set the precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.

Since the incident, Kitts has not participated in any races and has reportedly left the sport altogether. This abrupt end to his racing career illustrates the severe consequences of engaging in corrupt practices.

Consequences for Involved Parties

In addition to Kitts's departure from racing, John Higgins has faced repercussions from the BHA, including being placed on an exclusion list for failing to cooperate with the investigation. Notably, both Higgins and Barnes were penalised for not providing their phone records, a move that highlights the BHA's thorough approach to ensuring accountability among all parties involved in the sport.

Wider Implications for Horse Racing

The fallout from this case extends beyond Kitts and Higgins, raising broader questions about the integrity of horse racing in the UK. With the sport's reputation on the line, the BHA's actions will be closely monitored by the public, stakeholders, and participants alike. Maintaining public confidence is essential for the survival of horse racing as a popular sport.

Conclusion

The Kitts and Higgins case serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by regulatory bodies in maintaining the integrity of sports. As the BHA prepares for the upcoming sanctions hearing, it remains to be seen how these events will shape the future of horse racing in the UK. Will the outcome reinforce public confidence, or will it lead to further scrutiny of racing practices? Only time will tell.

#HorseRacing #IntegrityInSport #BHA

FAQs

What are the charges against Dylan Kitts?

Dylan Kitts has been found guilty of conspiring to prevent his horse, Hillsin, from achieving its best performance during a race, admitting to corrupt practices under pressure from trainer John Higgins.

What was the outcome of Chris Honour's hearing?

Chris Honour was cleared of involvement in the conspiracy but was found to have misled stewards during a post-race inquiry, resulting in disciplinary action by the BHA.

When is the sanctions hearing for Kitts and Higgins?

The sanctions hearing is expected to take place in early to mid-November 2023, where penalties for Kitts and any further actions against Higgins will be discussed.

What does the BHA's statement indicate about racing integrity?

The BHA emphasised that incidents like Kitts and Higgins's actions undermine public confidence in racing, which is crucial for the sport's viability and reputation.

How has this case affected Kitts's career?

Since the incident, Kitts has not ridden in any races and has reportedly left the sport, highlighting the severe consequences of engaging in corrupt practices.