How Can You Effectively Detect and Neutralize Drones?

Published: 2025-10-21 00:00:30 | Category: technology
The surge in drone technology has prompted the development of countermeasures to address security concerns, particularly in light of recent conflicts. Companies like MyDefence in Denmark are now producing equipment that jams and repels drones, primarily for military applications but with increasing interest from civilian sectors as well. This article explores the technology behind drone jamming, the growing demand for counter-drone solutions, and the implications for security across various industries.
Last updated: 15 October 2023 (BST)
Key Takeaways
- MyDefence has shifted focus from military clients to critical infrastructure protection.
- Drone jamming technology can effectively neutralise 80-90% of drones.
- Detection of drones remains a challenge due to their varied sizes and materials.
- Cost-effective solutions are crucial in countering the increasing prevalence of low-cost drones.
- Collaborative efforts between nations are essential for developing effective counter-drone measures.
The Rise of Drone Technology
Over the past few years, drone technology has advanced significantly. What began as a tool for recreational use has evolved into a critical component in both military and civilian operations. Drones are now utilised for various applications, including surveillance, delivery, and even entertainment. This surge in usage has, however, also raised concerns about security and privacy.
Drone Usage in Military and Civilian Sectors
Initially, military applications dominated the drone market, with countries like the UK and the US employing drones for reconnaissance and combat. However, civilian use has surged, including in sectors such as logistics, agriculture, and infrastructure inspection. This dual-use nature of drone technology has heightened the need for robust countermeasures to mitigate potential threats.
The Shift in Demand for Counter-Drone Technology
As noted by Dan Hermansen, CEO of MyDefence, there has been a notable shift in the demand for drone jamming technology. The company's traditional focus on military clients has expanded to include critical infrastructure sectors, highlighting the growing recognition of drone threats in everyday environments.
Why Critical Infrastructure Matters
Critical infrastructure refers to assets and systems vital for the functioning of a society and economy. This includes utilities, transportation systems, and communication networks. The increasing interest from companies in these sectors reflects heightened awareness of the vulnerabilities posed by drones. Potential threats could include surveillance, disruption of services, or even physical attacks.
How Drone Jamming Technology Works
MyDefence's equipment operates by detecting communication signals between a drone and its operator. Once identified, the device emits a powerful radio frequency signal that disrupts this connection. Rather than causing the drone to crash, the technology facilitates a controlled landing, reducing the risk of collateral damage.
The Effectiveness of Jamming
According to Mr Hermansen, radio frequency jamming can effectively neutralise 80-90% of drones. This statistic underscores the potential effectiveness of counter-drone measures in mitigating risks associated with increasing drone usage.
Challenges in Drone Detection
Despite the advancements in jamming technology, detecting drones poses significant challenges. Andreas Graae highlights that drones can vary greatly in size and construction materials, making them difficult to recognise on traditional radar systems.
Innovative Detection Solutions
To address these challenges, researchers are developing a suite of technologies aimed at improving drone detection capabilities:
- Acoustic Sensors: These devices listen for the characteristic buzzing sound produced by drones.
- Advanced Optical Cameras: High-resolution cameras can capture detailed images of drones, aiding in identification.
- Tactical Radars: New radar technologies can operate over longer distances and differentiate between drones and birds.
Countermeasures: From Jamming to Interception
Once a drone is detected, the next step is to neutralise the threat. While jamming is one option, there are various methods being explored, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
The Evolution of Electronic Warfare
The war in Ukraine has accelerated advancements in electronic warfare techniques. With frontline areas heavily jammed, both Russian and Ukrainian forces have adapted their strategies, using drones that are either fibre optic-controlled or can autonomously navigate pre-programmed routes.
Emerging Interception Technologies
Companies like Nordic Air Defence are exploring innovative interception solutions. Their low-cost interceptor, which can quickly strike a target drone, is a prime example of how manufacturers are working to develop effective countermeasures while keeping costs manageable. The interceptor is designed to be easily produced using 3D printing technology, making it a viable solution for many defence needs.
The Cost Factor in Countering Drones
Cost-effectiveness is critical in the development of counter-drone technologies. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte pointed out the absurdity of using expensive missiles to counter low-cost drones, which may only cost a few thousand dollars. This mismatch has prompted a focus on developing affordable solutions to maintain a strategic advantage.
Adapting to Changing Threats
As drones become more affordable and accessible, the need for innovative, low-cost countermeasures becomes increasingly urgent. Mr Graae notes that the conflict in Ukraine has highlighted the need for defenders to adapt quickly to shifting dynamics in drone warfare.
Security Implications Beyond the Battlefield
Drone-related security concerns are not limited to military contexts. Incidents involving rogue drones have been reported in various locations across Europe, including breaches of airspace in Poland and Romania, as well as sightings near military installations in Denmark.
Government Responses to Drone Threats
In response to these emerging threats, governments have begun to invest in anti-drone systems. Sweden's recent announcement of a £275 million investment in measures to detect, jam, and intercept drones reflects a broader trend across Europe toward strengthening national security against drone incursions.
Civilian Applications of Counter-Drone Technology
While military applications remain a key focus, the civilian sector also presents significant opportunities for counter-drone technology. Industries such as shipping, oil, and offshore operations are increasingly recognising the need to protect their assets from drone incursions.
Risks of Shooting Down Drones
In civilian settings, shooting down drones poses unique challenges. The potential for falling debris to cause injuries or damage must be carefully considered. As Kasper Hallenborg pointed out, even small drone fragments can pose risks, as evidenced by an incident in Poland where drone debris damaged a roof.
Alternative Neutralisation Methods
Given the risks associated with shooting down drones, alternative methods for neutralisation are being explored. These include:
- Net Systems: Shooting nets to entangle drones is a low-risk option at short ranges.
- Lasers: Affordable laser systems are being developed for targeting drones.
- Soft-Kill Options: Hacking a drone offers a way to control its landing safely, minimising risks to people and property.
The Need for Drone Traffic Management
As drone usage continues to proliferate, the establishment of a traffic management system for drones is becoming increasingly critical. This system could involve electronic licensing for drones and a registration process for flight plans.
Identifying Legitimate Drone Activity
Mr Hallenborg emphasises the importance of distinguishing between legitimate drone activities and potential threats. An effective traffic management system would help authorities quickly identify which drones are permitted in specific airspaces, reducing the burden on law enforcement agencies inundated with reports of drone sightings.
Conclusion
The rapid advancement of drone technology has created both opportunities and challenges. As the demand for counter-drone solutions grows, companies are innovating to develop effective measures that can safeguard both military and civilian interests. The need for a comprehensive approach, including detection, neutralisation, and traffic management, is more pressing than ever. As we move forward, how we adapt to these emerging threats will shape the future of airspace security.
#DroneTechnology #CounterDrone #AalborgInnovation
FAQs
What is drone jamming technology?
Drone jamming technology disrupts the communication between a drone and its operator by emitting powerful radio signals, allowing for controlled landings instead of crashes.
How effective is drone jamming?
Drone jamming can reportedly neutralise 80-90% of drones, making it a highly effective method for countering unwanted drone activity.
What are the challenges in detecting drones?
Drones pose detection challenges due to their varying sizes and materials, which can make them difficult to identify on traditional radar systems.
What are the alternatives to shooting down drones?
Alternatives include using nets to entangle drones, lasers for targeting, and soft-kill methods like hacking to control drone landings safely.
Why is a drone traffic management system needed?
A drone traffic management system is essential to distinguish between legitimate and malicious drone activities, helping to reduce unnecessary alerts and improve airspace safety.